jimO wrote:Pete'90 wrote:All the power and torque outputs are much the same across the entire range of utilities on the market. Drivability will determine the differences between them.
ranger 147kw colorado 147kw new hilux 132?
singlespeed wrote:[
Max power output is meaningless. Don't drink the kool-aid.
jimO wrote:Pete'90 wrote:All the power and torque outputs are much the same across the entire range of utilities on the market. Drivability will determine the differences between them.
ranger 147kw colorado 147kw new hilux 132?
Pete'90 wrote:jimO wrote:Pete'90 wrote:All the power and torque outputs are much the same across the entire range of utilities on the market. Drivability will determine the differences between them.
ranger 147kw colorado 147kw new hilux 132?
15kw, about the difference the raptor style grill makes when it has being installed.
Even the v8 cruiser is only 151kw and 430nm.
Power will be different across all the markets for the hilux.
MarkTGood wrote:On the subject of power, I currently own a 3.2 auto Ranger and believe me, the current Hilux will kick it's butt from a standing start. The lag is terrible on the Ranger, It's so bad I'd go as far to say it's dangerous
I test drove the new triton today and it wasn't much better, I will be keen to drive the new Hilux when it arrives as I think the twin turbo arrangement will help to reduce the turbo lag. Hopefully it's as easy to drive as the current one
Mark
MarkTGood wrote:On the subject of power, I currently own a 3.2 auto Ranger and believe me, the current Hilux will kick it's butt from a standing start. The lag is terrible on the Ranger, It's so bad I'd go as far to say it's dangerous
I test drove the new triton today and it wasn't much better, I will be keen to drive the new Hilux when it arrives as I think the twin turbo arrangement will help to reduce the turbo lag. Hopefully it's as easy to drive as the current one
Mark
Talktheroo wrote:Stats don't mean anything.
People that buy vehicles based on the manufacturing figures, are the loosers in all of this.
They mean nothing, and that video proves this.
It's the engineering that matters.
Best to ask trusted people in the mechanical and diesel fitting industries, what they think.
I know it's a bit hard on a new developed vehicle, as it hasn't proven it's self, yet.
The Roo.
singlespeed wrote:One stat that put me off the 3.2 Ranger was l/100km. [emoji2]
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests