There are few mutually unrelated notions denoted by “crystal” in mathematics.
One can of course talk about mathematical models of physical crystals and their geometry.
Another, is an intermediary notion leading to crystal bases of Kashiwara and of Lusztig, thus one associates a crystal to a quantized enveloping algebra. Finally, there are crystals due Grothendieck to which this entry is dedicated.
Grothendieck‘s differential calculus is based on the infinitesimal thickenings of a diagonal of a space. If one takes a completion, then there is a filtration on infinitesimals there. On the other hand, this theory also provides a concept of a regular differential operator which is also filtered (by the degree). There is a fundamental duality between the infinitesimals and regular differential operators which is compatible with the two filtrations, in fact the duality is a perfect pairing on each filtered level. This pairing gives for example that a D-module corresponds to a flat connection on a usual quasicoherent sheaf.
Infinitesimal version of flat connection in algebraic geometry is a Grothendieck connection. Flat connections can infinitesimally also be described as the descent data on de Rham spaces called the (co)stratification. There is a site (the crystalline site) which formalizes these descent data. It can be explained in many ways, including intuitively in the sense of infinitesimal elements in a scheme.
The crystals of quasicoherent sheaves are the quasicoherent sheaves of modules over the crystalline site and are in correspondence with usual quasicoherent sheaves over the underlying scheme with flat connection.
But Grothendieck considered not only descent for quasicoherent sheaves but also for affine schemes. This nonlinear version is harder and unlike descent for quasicoherent sheaves, it does not have a noncommutative generalization. Cf. p-connection.
(Zoran: we should find an exact reference from EGA or so for the descent for affine schemes).
Moreover this has also a crystalline version: crystals of affine schemes. This corresponds to a nonlinear version of D-modules, called D-schemes (also called diffieties by Vinogradov). As D-modules correspond to solutions of systems of linear differential equations, D-schemes correspond to systems of nonlinear ones. One has also analytic version (analytic D-spaces). One can do more general crystals, e.g. of affine schemes.
Jacob Lurie, Notes on crystals and algebraic D-modules, notes in Dennis Gaitsgory‘s seminar, pdf
Dennis Gaitsgory, Nick Rozenblyum, Crystals and D-modules, arxiv/1111.2087
A. Beilinson, V. Drinfel’d, Chiral algebras contains a section on D-schemes.
A. Grothendieck, Crystals and the de Rham cohomology of schemes, in “Dix exposes sur la cohomologie des schemas”
Clark Barwick, $\mathcal{D}$-crystals, notes from 2006 talk, pdf
mathoverflow: The Infinitesimal topos in positive characteristic
Last revised on February 6, 2020 at 10:51:40. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.