^Nicko wrote:It is running a bit better, the cold knock seemed less. I wont really know until the morning when i start it up in the driveway.
I have been considering writing to fair trading and Toyota about all of this, considering the evidence of the recalls overseas and what not and now my experience of taking it to Toyota twice and them telling me there was no problem and having no idea of a seat seal fault, i mean i even left it with them over night and they couldnt produce the smokey startup whereas Sydney Diesel said they started it in the morning and the workshop filled up.
Have guys like you Roo, Steven, Boxhead and BDG who seem to have a bit of knowledge on this tried to take it any further ?
Do you think its worth trying or would it be a waist of time ?
I personally think that if a sub-standard copper washer was used and identified to be a manufacturing fault then Toyota should be liable for any rectification
Some important points you make there, Nicko.
To cut a long story short, so to speak, the courts look at the seats as being a manufacturing fault that should have been recalled. This is with cases that I have been involved in.
As soon as the magistrate sees the procedure laid out, as in the GISC procedure for the valve clearances, it's pretty well open and shut. The audible check is unacceptable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sHqcv61bM4
If the audible checks were done at the 40,000 and 80,000km services, under warranty, the original seats are still in there.
Like I said, unacceptable, in practice and from a legal perspective.
The Roo.